Adjunct Academic Workers Are Marginalized
Monday, February 19th, 2007– Janina Ciezadlo
Dear Ms. Ehrenreich and Draut:
This might be my twenty-fifth year of teaching. I am still making an entry-level salary, and I receive no benefits. I was happy to see your article in the Nation–I copied and distributed it to friends. I applaud your idea to create an organization that can bring together people who have been cut loose from the comforts of salaries and health care.
I hope your organization will be interested in working with the contingent academic workers who make up about 49% nationwide (about 80% in our region according to AAUP figures) of college teachers. My work with our part-time faculty union has made it clear to me that larger affiliations are necessary. My experience with the sink of identity politics which has benefited only a very few has likewise convinced me that work is a key point of affiliation, even in this post-work entrepreneurial, read downsized, environment.
Many people cannot understand my lack of ability to accept the degradation of the professorate (tied, of course, to the abandonment of public education in general) or my commitment to education. The people I work with seem to think or at least treat this situation as natural, most especially the people who have made themselves comfortable by studying the workings of hegemony. But, because I am not given to abstraction, and I am given to reading Bordieu and David Harvey, oh and Ehrenreich, I can see that this is a situation that has been carefully produced. And that my esteemed and reasonably remunerated colleagues’ collusion is just what is wanted, no, required of them.
In the early nineties when I came to Chicago and started working part-time, I was a founder and still work with, right now I am the outgoing President, of a part-time faculty union, which although it is hampered by things as they are, has at least provided us with some basic gains in salary and seniority and some important lessons in collective action. However, it is crushing to work with colleagues on a day-to-day basis who have been economically and psychologically battered by the casualization of academic labor, and exploitation of the arts, all the more so, while we remain working side-by-side, doing exactly the same work as others who prosper.
Colleagues greeted with accolades and advancements rather than averted eyes, who dismiss us as inferior while they profit from our marginalization. Our situation is not as dire as some, granted, but arguing from the worst case, that is comparing us with the bottom, reminding us that we are more fortunate than people who are destitute, if that shaming fails, giving us ideologically-laden advice on how to maintain a happy frame of mind which is what many of my friends do when I talk about my situation as a way of shutting me up–especially my friends (male and female) who have successful spouses and have no insight into what it means to be your own breadwinner.
Others, who have been hit by the changes in the workplace and economy understand, but we are usually at loss to find solutions. Your organization can provide a place, virtual or otherwise where we can discuss the binds we find ourselves in, and perhaps see them as political, not personal, so that we look for productive solutions. In Chicago we have an organization called COCAL, Chicago Coalition of Contingent academic labor which is now trilateral: Their meetings include people from all over the US and Mexico and Canada.
The IEA/NEA adjunct unions meet in a city-wide caucus every couple of months and everything we have learned as a group about health care, leads us to look toward a single payer plan as the best option. Even the designation: “contingent” raises a flag to the insurers and casts us, not as stable working people, (which we are, it’s the system that is unstable,) but as transients, uncatagorizable, bad risks, as if our precarious status was the result of our own bad choices, the same way poverty is cast as the result of behaviors, rather than injustice or real estate practices and globalization.
Of course, our betters in the academic world see our situation this way, and now a new group of privileged young people are judging us. Working with the union makes the decisions that administrators make very clear. The corporatization of academe has made labor, the raison d’ etre, of schools and the central teacher-student relationship into a cheap commodity. Market forces have winnowed humanism away from a liberal, humanist education. For those of us who had the chance to make choices that led us into the arts or even certain kinds of journalism, exclusion has always been part of the deal.
What I see in Chicago is a terrible cleavage between the haves and the have-nots in these creative and educational fields. This double world of the arts is exacerbated by the comodification of the art school experience, and larger forces like the lack of a market in the Midwest, and the demise of the National Endowment. I make $250.00 an article for the Chicago Reader, so I have to keep teaching. And as you know: there is so much to write!
I have skills to offer your organization in addition to the thirty six dollars: I am a writer, and I have organizing skills: I began the association that became the first part-time union in a private school and I continue to work with my local and the IEA/NEA. The IEA/NEA, as important as it has been for us, is primarily a union for K-12 so there are some disconnects when it comes to understudying the kind of commitment and investment in the non-teaching aspects of our professions.
The current drift, as far as I can tell, is to refuse to recognize, because recognition would throw the inequities into relief, our professional attainments from the institution of higher education, so we are getting it from both sides. Unions have trouble recognizing intellectual work or “cultural practice” as they used to say in the 80s.
One other note: I designed and taught several classes at another highly, but not the most highly, esteemed institution in Chicago, on representations of work in the arts and in film. I have been thinking about what work is, how we think about it, and the rest of these questions for quite some time.
Please contact me to contribute if you need a voice, or as they say, a warm body. I have already copied your article to distribute to the local adjunct labor crowd. I am attracted by the idea that more and more people can be mobilized around their working identities and use their power to address problems in working conditions, and importantly to work for a single payer plan. Sign me up, in the parallel universe with the shadow people. Thanks for reading my screed! Thanks for taking action.


