UP - United Professionals

Circuit City Slaughter

by Barbara Ehrenreich
Barbara\'s Blog, April 09, 2007
Link to article

Columnist Bill White of the Allentown Morning Call pictures Circuit City CEO Philip J. Schoonover getting a warm welcome to hell – very warm. Satan tells him, “This place is full of overpaid, outsourcing, golden-parachuting, employee-abusing worms like you.” Schoonover’s sin? Laying off 3400 employees because they had been around for too long and needed to be replaced by minimum wage workers. His punishment? Having a choice of Dick Cheney or Nancy Grace as a roommate and spending eternity listening to Sanjaya’s Greatest Hits.

The New York Times took the Circuit City slaughter with much greater equanimity. In his economics column last week, Times columnist David Leonhardt showed some pious sympathy for the laid-off, who will, after a 10 week cooling off period, be able to re-apply for their old jobs at much reduced pay. But he goes on to explain that Circuit City’s employee abuse is just part of the larger corporate demand for “efficiency.” Wal-Mart, after all, has capped employee pay and taken the stools away from its elderly employees. Sadly, Leonhardt notes:

It’s probably not possible to halt these changes. It may not even be desirable. The flexibility of the American labor force seems to be one reason that recessions have become less frequent and unemployment is less of a problem here than in Europe, notes Jason Furman, a leading Democratic economist

Furman, by the way, is a pretty flexible guy himself. An advisor to John Kerry in 04, then an NYU professor, and now a project director at the Brookings Institute, he’s made his mark as a “liberal” defender of Wal-Mart’s anti-worker policies. It’s fellows like Furman who put the “ick” in the word “Democratic.”

But from Allentown to Times Square, no one is commenting on where the new flexibility may be taking us. Time was, not so long ago, when seniority was rewarded with higher pay and other perks. But that higher pay now carries a lethal risk. As a friend who writes software for a major multinational explained to me: “If you ask for a raise, the boss is going to say, ‘Why would you want that? It would be like having a bulls-eye painted on your back.’” The more you make, the more tempting it is to fire you.

I experienced this myself a few years ago when I lost a lucrative writing contract with a major media outlet. “Why?” I asked my agent. “They said they were paying you more than any of their other outside writers,” she told me, as if that were a sufficient explanation. Foolish me, I thought the raises I had gotten meant the bosses were pleased with my work. What they meant was that I was doomed.

Once you fire the high-performers and experienced workers, the next step will be to demand that employees pay you for the privilege of working. Why not? Most workplaces provide air-conditioned environments and bathroom facilities, complete with soap and paper towels. These are things you’d expect to pay for in a hotel, so why should workers get them free? Having busted his $10-20 an hour senior employees down to $7 and change an hour, Schoonover’s bound to see that the best route to higher profit margins is negative pay.

I know what Schoonover’s defense will be when he gets to the Pearly Gates: “The market made me do it.” He’ll be confident about getting in to the Good Place, because for men like him, as well as Leonhardt and Furman, whom he’ll bring along as character witnesses, the market is in fact the deity, determining who will starve and who will eat, who will work and who will beg.

But if the deity is someone other than “the market,” if He or She turns out to be a moral entity, capable of distinguishing right from wrong, then poor Schoonover – it’ll be Sanjaya for all eternity.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

3 Responses to “Circuit City Slaughter”

  1. Anonymous Says:

    Maybe I’m missing something here, but just what exactly in the Employee Free Choice Act would have saved the Circuit City workers? My take is that such a provision in law would only accelerate this practice. Perhaps the real legislative target should have been bureaucrats such as that Chicago Alderman who, upon being told that Wal-Mart would locate a store right in her very own district, rescinded her approval of the living wage bill! But the lack of any political, public or media outcry over that obvious corruption indicates that was also just another opportunity missed.

  2. Stuart Smith Says:

    Barbara,

    While reading the latest issue of Forbes, I came across your article discussing the correct execution of networking and United Professionals.

    The recently unemployed workers of Circuit City are victims of a poorly managed company. Inefficiencies in their business processes led Circuit City to make the easiest reduction to their costs, labor. Does Satan already have a room prepared for the CEO of Circuit City? I will leave that answer to someone else.

    Part of the mission for United Professionals is to preserve the American Middle Class from downsizing and outsourcing. All of us here may embody the effort of grouping together as a united front, but a front for whom? For whom do we appeal to as a united front? Please do not burden these questions with a tone of negativity, but allow them to remind us to be congnizant of what the future entails.

    Will United Professionals manifest itself into the United Professionals Union? Will our immediate roster comprise of unemployed white collar workers? Will the resolve of this newly developed Union fade as its membership numbers decline when the current Union members find jobs?

    Do we envision a unionized white-collar labor force for Bank of America, Microsoft?

    I have to admit (take it with a grain of salt), currently I am more sold on the idea of United Professionals, than I am sold on the real impact in can have in the future. Without hesitation, your work on this is extremely valuable and needed in these changing times.

    Once we unite, what action are we prepared to take to protect this American Dream?

  3. AKS Says:

    Agreed. A Union for white collar professionals is what is needed, not a ‘revolution’ which inevitably will end up violent and counter-productive.

    Will this Union loose its membership when it’s members find jobs? I doubt it considering the underhanded way most people are laid off now-a-days.

    What is going on in America today, under the watchful eyes of the Democrats and Republicans is a life changing experience. It won’t end when ones future looks bright again.

Leave a Reply